delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs |
Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:58:10 -0600 (CST) |
From: | Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU> |
To: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
cc: | pavenis AT lanet DOT lv, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: (patch) updated protoize patch |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000119121300.9609d-100000@is> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.HPP.3.96.1000119205646.12013B-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | dj-admin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > We should use __DJGPP__ when the code uses some feature or function > specific to DJGPP, and __MSDOS__ for code that should work with any > MS-DOS compiler or code that works around some MS-DOS-specific > problem. > > What kind of problem/feature are we talking about in this case? I just pointed out the use of DJGPP, as opposed to __DJGPP__. There's really no problem here, especially since I didn't add that change to the patch I just submitted to gcc-patches. See my next message for details. Regards, Mumit
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |