delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2000/01/19/21:58:43

X-Authentication-Warning: hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:58:10 -0600 (CST)
From: Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: (patch) updated protoize patch
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000119121300.9609d-100000@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.1000119205646.12013B-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> We should use __DJGPP__ when the code uses some feature or function
> specific to DJGPP, and __MSDOS__ for code that should work with any
> MS-DOS compiler or code that works around some MS-DOS-specific
> problem.
> 
> What kind of problem/feature are we talking about in this case?

I just pointed out the use of DJGPP, as opposed to __DJGPP__. There's
really no problem here, especially since I didn't add that change to
the patch I just submitted to gcc-patches. See my next message for
details.

Regards,
Mumit


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019