Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2000/01/19/11:29:32
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:
> But in the non-LFN case, it's still the scheme above, isn't it?
Almost (good ideas--yours--never need to be rethought or replaced ;-).
The change is that the latest port supports numbered backups (if the
user thus requested) even on 8+3 filesystems. For example:
foo.c -> foo.c1~
foo.cc -> foo.c2~ (because foo.c1~ already exists above!)
Note: I didn't release this port yet (it's Patch 2.5.3), but I will do it
soon, after I retrofit the changes into patch 2.5.4. Since Patch didn't
see an official release for for the last 2 1/2 years, it seems justified
to release a beta, as it has several important improvements.
- Raw text -