Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2000/01/19/05:58:38
On 18 Jan 00, at 21:11, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> Mumit Khan wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your comments. Since you mention that foo.c.X is not a legal
> > DOS filename, there is another one to deal with -- currently a foo.c is
> > saved as foo.c.save. I've tentatively changed that to `foo.csaved'
> > instead, which looks ugly but at least workable.
>
> Mmm... and what do we do about foo.bar? foo.barsaved is truncated to
> foo.bar and overwrites the original file.
>
> foo.sav might be more reasonable.
> --
We'll I checked behaviour of protoize from my last build of GCC-2.95.2
I uploaded to ftp.delorie.com. Unfortunatelly I didn't do it earlier.
DOSEMU 0.99.13 under Linux (no LFN):
protoize doesn't work at all and is not getting far enough to
rename old file
unprotoize fails to rename file. When I hexeditted exe file to
append "_save" instead of ".save" it worked
WIN95:
Both protoize and unprotoize doesn't work at all (infinit loop)
So if broken protoize.exe and unprotoize.exe is problem serious
enough, then I'll have to upload update when it will be available.
Andris
- Raw text -