Date:	Mon, 3 Jan 2000 10:49:04 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
cc:	salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: GDB, DOS 6.22, CWSDPMI and Interrupts
In-Reply-To:	<10001021628.AA02691@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000103104832.14725F-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 2 Jan 100, Charles Sandmann wrote:

> Back in r3? r2? there were optimizations added to handle int31 mostly in
> protected mode, and it's quite possible when hooked they don't handle the
> interrupt flag right.  We probably ought to try it on the previous 
> releases of CWSDPMI (beta 9 - r3) and see when it worked, if ever.

I just tried with CWSDPMI v0.9r1, the version distributed with Quake
(dated July 12, 1996), and the problem exists there as well.

- Raw text -