delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <199911161632.KAA27135@darwin.sfbr.org> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Nov 1999 10:32:47 -0600 (CST) |
From: | Jeff Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org> |
Subject: | Re: First alpha symlink patch |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.3.4 SunOS 5.7 sun4u sparc |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
-: > Wouldn't it be good to let symlinks be, say, 512 (or 511 if power of -: > two isn't good), the smallest cluster size if I'm not mistaken, if we -: > need some more space later. -: -: This is acceptable - however I can't imagine right now, why the additional -: space is required. OTOH, you'll *always* have a least a cluster's worth of space (for possible future use), even if the directory entry reports fewer bytes than that.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |