Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1999/11/03/19:25:52
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> We could force the use of !proxy if the program is a symlink. (I'm
> guessing that you check whether the program is a symlink before the
> decision is made how to invoke it.)
Because I added symlink support to low level of library (not the lowest -
_open(), _chmod() and other direct wrappers to DOS calls are untouched),
currently I do not check it directly because _check_v2_prog() works correctly
with symlinks too. Sure, it is possible to check for symlinks and use
!proxy then, but I want to have symlink implementation nice & clean, and
in this case - transparent.
> Do I understand that you don't intend to support symlinks to
> non-DJGPP programs, because of this?
I don't.
Laurynas Biveinis
- Raw text -