From:	Alain Magloire <alainm AT rcsm DOT ece DOT mcgill DOT ca>
Message-Id:	<199910241843.OAA27516@mccoy2.ECE.McGill.CA>
Subject:	Re: Bug in fsetpos()?
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date:	Sun, 24 Oct 1999 14:43:17 -0400 (EDT)
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.991024093353.29385M-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Oct 24, 99 09:34:20 am
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Bonjour M. Eli Zaretskii

> On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Alain Magloire wrote:
> 
> > I don't think this is a bug, fsetpos() returns 0 if it succeeds otherwise
> > it returns a non-zero value and sets errno to indicate the error.
> 
> Right.  But if fseek returns -1, that surely counts as a failure,
> right?  So ignoring the return value of fseek *is* a bug, since that
> makes fsetpos return zero when in fact it failed.
> 

Yes, apologies to Richard for not reading is post correctly.

-- 
au revoir, alain
----
Aussi haut que l'on soit assis, on est toujours assis que sur son cul !!!

- Raw text -