Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1999/10/17/08:29:54
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, DJ Delorie wrote:
> I definitely want to avoid adding hooks in libc for things that can be
> done with fsexts. The exceptions so far are for obviously common
> things, like /dev/null and a few other renames.
With some simple changes to FSEXT, it can be made much friendlier to
such features. All we need is a reliable way to control the order of
invocation of FSEXT handlers at run time, and perhaps also to arrange
for a return value that will cause libc to call the previous handler
(i.e., a way to chain to the previous handler that hooked the same
service/handle).
Any takers?
- Raw text -