Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 1999 19:03:55 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT Delorie DOT com>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT Delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: xmalloc and xfree
In-Reply-To:	<199910111505.LAA24879@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.991011190233.436C-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, DJ Delorie wrote:

> Note that many programs that use xmalloc/xfree provide their own
> (often incompatible) prototypes.  Hence the commenting-out.

Sure, but that was an okay solution as long as it would compile with the 
default switches.  If it now does NOT compile in C++ programs, it is IMHO 
better to supply a wrong prototype that compiles than prevent them from 
compiling at all.

- Raw text -