delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1999/10/11/13:58:17

Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 13:21:52 -0400
Message-Id: <199910111721.NAA25761@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.991011191335.436G-100000@is> (message from Eli
Zaretskii on Mon, 11 Oct 1999 19:15:03 +0200 (IST))
Subject: Re: xmalloc and xfree
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991011191335 DOT 436G-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Do you object to enabling the prototype under __cplusplus?

I'm concerned that adding the prototype will cause more trouble than
it's worth.  If C++ programs are supposed to use new/delete anyway,
why is the prototype needed at all?

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019