delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 11 Oct 1999 13:21:52 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <199910111721.NAA25761@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.991011191335.436G-100000@is> (message from Eli |
Zaretskii on Mon, 11 Oct 1999 19:15:03 +0200 (IST)) | |
Subject: | Re: xmalloc and xfree |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991011191335 DOT 436G-100000 AT is> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Do you object to enabling the prototype under __cplusplus? I'm concerned that adding the prototype will cause more trouble than it's worth. If C++ programs are supposed to use new/delete anyway, why is the prototype needed at all?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |