Message-ID:	<37CABF35.31A77786@softhome.net>
Date:	Mon, 30 Aug 1999 19:28:21 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: symlink() & is_v2_prog() question
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990830190800 DOT 10193F-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> 
> > > Call me a coward.  I'm afraid to break a good thing that DJGPP is now.
> >
> > I understand you. So symlinks will wait. For a long time.
> 
> No, that's not what I meant to say.  I was just explaining my views.
> However, I won't dream dictating my views to the rest if I'm the only one
> who shares them.

No, you do have a point, I don't say that waiting is a bad thing.

> So if you want to work on this, please do.  If nobody else besides me
> objects, your work will be included in v2.04.

BTW, what's criterion for bumping middle DJGPP version number? I mean,
how big changes should be for 2.10 release?

Laurynas Biveinis

- Raw text -