Message-ID:	<37CAA384.596E068A@softhome.net>
Date:	Mon, 30 Aug 1999 17:30:12 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: symlink() & is_v2_prog() question
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990830165106 DOT 1411D-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> No, I meant that we shouldn't get anywhere near the v2.0 status in future
> versions at all.  When v2.0 was released, there were several people who
> actively developed DJGPP and who understood very well the intricacies of
> the DJGPP environment.  I don't expect that to be true in the future.

It seems that I'm few years too late... ;-)

> Call me a coward.  I'm afraid to break a good thing that DJGPP is now.

I understand you. So symlinks will wait. For a long time.

Laurynas Biveinis

- Raw text -