Date:	Sun, 15 Aug 1999 13:06:10 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Alain Magloire <alainm AT rcsm DOT ece DOT mcgill DOT ca>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: `which' for 2.03?
In-Reply-To:	<199908131847.OAA15597@spock2.ECE.McGill.CA>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990815130351.1935W-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Alain Magloire wrote:

> I just realise there is a  GNU which package should not be to hard(sic)
> to get it to work on DJGPP.

Any takers?

I looked at the package some time ago.  The porting shouldn't be hard, 
but isn't trivial, either.  The usual nuisance with DOS drive-letter 
brain-damage in file names, and the colon/semi-colon problem in PATH are 
the gotchas.  But there were others, I forget the details. 

- Raw text -