delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <199908051235.HAA13563@darwin.sfbr.org> |
Date: | Thu, 5 Aug 1999 07:35:42 -0500 (CDT) |
From: | Jeff Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org> |
Subject: | Re: CPU identification (Was: Re: uname -m ?) |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.3.4 SunOS 5.7 sun4u sparc |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
-: if all what "uname -m" has to do is print i[3-6]86, -: then this program below should do it correctly. I Would there be any point in having `uname' also test for and report the presence of a functional FPU for those processors where it was actually an option (e.g., with 386s, and with some crippled 486 versions, IIRC).
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |