Sender:	root AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<37A838B2.13B7F4E0@inti.gov.ar>
Date:	Wed, 04 Aug 1999 09:57:22 -0300
From:	salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Accept-Language:	es-AR, en, es
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: CPU identification (Was: Re: uname -m ?)
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990803104713 DOT 1847N-100000 AT is> <37A6E429 DOT 6245A110 AT softhome DOT net> <37A7563C DOT FF6D5A62 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <37A7EC52 DOT BF994B23 AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> salvador wrote:
> > NT defines an environment variable with the CPU ID, so I think the program
> > should first try with it if NT is detected.
>
> I don't have access to NT docs/NT itself. If anybody
> knows, please tell me.

Ugh, so ... should I boot my NT 4 server? ;-), I'll try to do it.

> > Why don't use the routines found in Allegro? they are very well tested.
>
> I took a look at those routines. And was surprised. Mine prg
> uses one cpu detection program found somewhere in x2ftp.
> Allegro uses the same routines. I tried to add Cyrix detection
> from them, but then it started to detect my CPU as Cyrix :)

Usually these routines are from Intel manuals, isn't surprising they are so
similar.

SET

--
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
                    set AT ieee DOT org set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013

- Raw text -