Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1999/08/03/08:54:49
Thanks. Now test is Ok. However I don't think it's so bad I have to
rebuild gcc-2.95 for DJGPP unless there will be another reason.
Andris
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > > DJ, is it a good idea to have %p imply the base of 16 in doscan.c?
> >
> > The only rule is that what printf prints for %p is what scanf should
> > expect for %p. It could be in pig-latin as long as it worked.
> > Borland, for example, prints 0000:0000 in some models.
>
> I believe the patch below solves the problem. Andris, could you
> please see if it helps to pass the test where you discovered this
> problem?
>
> *** src/libc/ansi/stdio/doscan.c~3 Wed Jul 28 18:08:52 1999
> --- src/libc/ansi/stdio/doscan.c Mon Aug 2 22:31:44 1999
> *************** _innum(int **ptr, int type, int len, int
> *** 195,201 ****
> base = 10;
> if (type=='o')
> base = 8;
> ! else if (type=='x')
> base = 16;
> np = numbuf;
> expseen = 0;
> --- 195,201 ----
> base = 10;
> if (type=='o')
> base = 8;
> ! else if (type=='x'||type=='p')
> base = 16;
> np = numbuf;
> expseen = 0;
>
- Raw text -