Date:	Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:12:20 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: .align directives in libc.a
In-Reply-To:	<199907210026.AAA10018@out5.ibm.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990721111148.7757T-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Mark E. wrote:

> So it appears estimated libc bloat is correct.

Then I suggest to aim at having the next release of Binutils use
16-byte section alignment for DJGPP.  Do you agree?

> The tests were done with BFD assembler updated from CVS late
> yesterday.

I understand that the assembler used, whether BFD or not, doesn't
affect neither the alignment issue, nor anything else.  Am I missing
something?  This assembler schism subject is not really documented in
the Binutils distribution, so it's hard to be sure.

- Raw text -