delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Wed, 7 Jul 1999 10:33:43 -0400 (EDT) |
Message-Id: | <199907071433.KAA07076@indy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990707172813.2851u-100000@is> (message from Eli |
Zaretskii on Wed, 7 Jul 1999 17:29:34 +0300 (IDT)) | |
Subject: | Re: .align directives in libc.a |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Then what is the purpose of having .align directives in the assembly > modules in the library? At least in crt0.S and in exceptn.S it looks > like they are judiciously placed where performance really matters. They have the most effect when placed *between* things, to *restore* alignment that may have been lost due to unknown sizes of functions, data objects, etc, within that object. Placing them at the beginning of a section has no effect.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |