Message-ID:	<19990629134730.57318@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:47:30 +0200
From:	Jan Hubicka <hubicka AT atrey DOT karlin DOT mff DOT cuni DOT cz>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Regparm and asm statements.. what now?
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.84
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hi
I have new few days to play with the regparmized libc code, so I would like
to know your opinions and if it does have chance to get into official distribution.

The largest problems are asm functions. Most of them are in the DPMI stubs.
I was thinking about changing the current asm macros to let generate functions
in both format and it seems to be impossible. So I believe that the easiest
way to fix them is to write replacements using asm statements. What do you
think about it? It this acceptable? If so I can do it.
gcc can be smart enought to generate code in the same quality I hope..

Honza
-- 
                       OK. Lets make a signature file.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|        Jan Hubicka (Jan Hubi\v{c}ka in TeX) hubicka AT freesoft DOT cz         |
|         Czech free software foundation: http://www.freesoft.cz          |
|AA project - the new way for computer graphics - http://www.ta.jcu.cz/aa |
|  homepage: http://www.paru.cas.cz/~hubicka/, games koules, Xonix, fast  |
|  fractal zoomer XaoS, index of Czech GNU/Linux/UN*X documentation etc.  | 
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+

- Raw text -