Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 1999 14:15:33 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Small changes to DJGPP.ENV
In-Reply-To:	<B0000090429@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990614141154.8278B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 14 Jun 1999 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> > Why does this break things?  This should only be a problem if the two 
> > versions of cpp.exe are different.  Or did I miss something?
> 
> They ARE different. gcc-2.95 installation installs cpp.exe it in $prefix/bin.

Sorry, I'm confused.  It seems that gcc-2.95 installs two versions of 
cpp.exe: one is cpp itself, the other is actually a variant of gcc.exe, 
or its symlink (the latter goes to $DJDIR/bin).  This much I understand.

But how all this is relevant to GCC 2.8.1?  I don't see two copies of 
cpp.exe there, and I have gcc281b.zip from October 1998, which is the 
latest, I think.  Yet you still say that this problem exists in 2.8.1 as 
well?

- Raw text -