delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 7 Jun 1999 09:48:06 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: __dpmi_simulate_real_mode_procedure_retf_stack |
In-Reply-To: | <9906031553.AA16649@clio.rice.edu> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990607094736.18114I-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Charles Sandmann wrote: > > So to fix this, we need to right-shift the argument before putting it in > > ECX. Then the docs could be left alone. Alternatively, we could change > > the docs to say "words" and change the code to use MOVSW instead of MOVSB > > when copying to the PM stack. > > I would prefer the later, so the wrapper function is similar to the DPMI spec. Done. Thanks for the feedback.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |