Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1999/05/24/04:51:11
On Thu, 20 May 1999, Pierre Muller wrote:
> And finally I got something that worked quite well
> But someone made small change to the dbgcom.c code that
> I still don't understand :
> especially, I did a redirect of the main signals each time
> the child was allowed to continue in hook_dpmi
> but this was placed in the global part of edi_init
> and the dbgsig is not restored after !
> This might be a problem here !
Could you please elaborate on the nature of the possible problems, and
tell exactly what change are you talking about?
Btw, I find much of the code added to dbgcom.c under-documented to a
disturbing degree. It would be nice to add a few more comments there
about what's going on, and why, including pointers to specific problems
solved by the various tricks. I'm afraid we would otherwise have code
that cannot be maintained without breaking.
No offence meant to those who labored on that code, of course.
- Raw text -