Message-Id:	<m10cX4o-000S8hC@inti.gov.ar>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From:	"Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 28 Apr 1999 10:43:16 +0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: [dma AT hpesdma DOT fc DOT hp DOT com: Performance Observation]
References:	<m10c8II-000S74C AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990428095032.25283D-100000@is>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> asked:
 
> On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:
> 
> > > The performance drop seems to be an alignment problem. Specifically, with the
> > > fft benchmark, gcc 2.7.2 is faster than gcc 2.8.1. There is no considerable
> > > differnce in the generated code, and some experiments with mixed compilation
> > > seem to confim this. Recent version of egcs are supposed to fix this.
> > 
> > Check this:
> > 
> > http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/compila.html
> 
> Salvador, did I miss something in this page?  I don't find there anything 
> that is related to alignment.
 
Nope, the page will help to compare 2.8.1 with "Recent version of egcs are 
supposed to fix this."

SET
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(5411) 4759 0013

- Raw text -