Date:	Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:51:29 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [dma AT hpesdma DOT fc DOT hp DOT com: Performance Observation]
In-Reply-To:	<m10c8II-000S74C@inti.gov.ar>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990428095032.25283D-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:

> > The performance drop seems to be an alignment problem. Specifically, with the
> > fft benchmark, gcc 2.7.2 is faster than gcc 2.8.1. There is no considerable
> > differnce in the generated code, and some experiments with mixed compilation
> > seem to confim this. Recent version of egcs are supposed to fix this.
> 
> Check this:
> 
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/compila.html

Salvador, did I miss something in this page?  I don't find there anything 
that is related to alignment.

- Raw text -