Date:	Sun, 18 Apr 1999 13:54:33 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Stack in djgpp
In-Reply-To:	<m10XsfE-000S8ZC@inti.gov.ar>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990418135400.22615N-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:

> I'll compile the code at home this weekend (with 2.02)

Please be aware of the following gotcha: even if you compile with
v2.02, you could get a v2.01 stub if the stubify step is done by a
linker which has a v2.01 stub built into it.  So either use `stubify'
from v2.02 to produce the .exe, or set up your linker to use a v2.02
stub.

The best way to be sure which stub you get is to look into the binary
(e.g., with "strings -a").

- Raw text -