Message-Id:	<m10Xsh0-000S74C@inti.gov.ar>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From:	"Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
To:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 15 Apr 1999 17:29:52 +0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Stack in djgpp
References:	<m10XR79-000S8IC AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.OSF.3.94.990415082319.20465A-100000@acaxp6>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> said:
> > > Answer in a nutshell: there *is* no 'spawn' on Unix (including Linux).
> > > spawn and friends are a DOSism.
> > 
> > Ok, so what's the best in this case:
> > 1) Add conditional compilation stuff (makes the code harder to understand)
> > 2) Implement spawn and make it conditional (taked from libc in DOS or the 
> > emulation under Linux).
> 
> You could do that. But I strongly doubt you'ld ever manage to get the
> maintainer of the original Unix version to accept that (s)he has to use a
> DOSism like spawn, instead of the 'native' Unix method of fork/exec. 

I'll try to use system, but the author is interested in the port and won't 
reject a spawn emulation.

SET 
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(5411) 4759 0013

- Raw text -