delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 1999 14:05:18 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Michael Bukin <M DOT A DOT Bukin AT inp DOT nsk DOT su> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Question about standards |
In-Reply-To: | <20btgqwicf.fsf@Sky.inp.nsk.su> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990415140415.26213p-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 15 Apr 1999, Michael Bukin wrote: > What does standard say about members of struct passwd in <pwd.h> > and struct group in <grp.h>? Namely, about pw_passwd, pw_gecos and > gr_passwd fields. AFAIK, all of these are non-Posix. pw_gecos and gr_passwd certainly are. > I have seen these fields used unconditionally in > some multiplatform packages. These packages are non-portable. What else is new?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |