delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:55:00 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <199904081555.LAA13248@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990408112409.29868N-100000@is> (message from Eli |
Zaretskii on Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:24:30 +0200 (IST)) | |
Subject: | Re: fflush question |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990408112409 DOT 29868N-100000 AT is> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> I agree, provided that many/most Unix systems indeed behave that way. > Could people please test this on the systems they have access to? Linux doesn't need fsync(). This works as expected: #include <stdio.h> main() { FILE *a, *b; int i; a = fopen("foo1", "w"); fprintf(a, "123456"); fflush(a); b = fopen("foo1", "r"); fscanf(b, "%d", &i); printf("i=%d\n"); }
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |