| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:55:00 -0400 |
| Message-Id: | <199904081555.LAA13248@envy.delorie.com> |
| From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
| CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990408112409.29868N-100000@is> (message from Eli |
| Zaretskii on Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:24:30 +0200 (IST)) | |
| Subject: | Re: fflush question |
| References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990408112409 DOT 29868N-100000 AT is> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> I agree, provided that many/most Unix systems indeed behave that way.
> Could people please test this on the systems they have access to?
Linux doesn't need fsync(). This works as expected:
#include <stdio.h>
main()
{
FILE *a, *b;
int i;
a = fopen("foo1", "w");
fprintf(a, "123456");
fflush(a);
b = fopen("foo1", "r");
fscanf(b, "%d", &i);
printf("i=%d\n");
}
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |