delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:24:30 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: fflush question |
In-Reply-To: | <199904061506.LAA08778@envy.delorie.com> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990408112409.29868N-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, DJ Delorie wrote: > > fflush(fpw); > > /*fsync(fileno(fpw));*/ > > I suspect this is a "bug" in dos, but that most unix programs that > care would expect it to work without fsync. If calling fsync is what > we need to do to make fflush work like unix, I have no problem adding > it. I agree, provided that many/most Unix systems indeed behave that way. Could people please test this on the systems they have access to?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |