delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | ieva01.lanet.lv: pavenis owned process doing -bs |
Date: | Tue, 6 Apr 1999 19:52:38 +0300 (WET) |
From: | Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv> |
To: | "Mark E." <snowball3 AT usa DOT net> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: djgpp.env question |
In-Reply-To: | <199904061607.QAA97242@out2.ibm.net> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.A41.4.05.9904061940130.19724-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Mark E. wrote: > Is gcc 2.8.1 like egcs 1.1 in not needing the variables defined in the > [cpp] and [gcc] sections of djgpp.env? If so, can those sections be > removed? I think it should be safe to remove them. One more thing to mention: perhaps finally it's time to remove lib/specs from djdevXXX.zip. If we are dropping support for gcc-2.7.2.1 then there should be no harm from it as it's provided with gcc-2.8.1 and egcs-1.1.2 binaries. Andris
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |