Sender:	nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID:	<37050920.EFF73D7@cartsys.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Apr 1999 10:14:56 -0800
From:	Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5 i586)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [davidprrenz AT cityweb DOT de: DJGPP-Problem]
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990402081751 DOT 22974I-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> 
> > Btw, this doesn't seem to be in the FAQ (unless I've missed something).
> 
> Why should it?  The FAQ is not an ANSI C handbook, and this question
> doesn't arise too frequently to deserve special treatment, IMHO.

I guess DJ feels differently then; if it's annoying enough to merit a
libc change in his opinion, he presumably also would like to see it in
the FAQ.  And IMHO the FAQ should be the first thing to consider.

My $.02
-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com

- Raw text -