Sender:	nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID:	<3701B482.1BC5A9C0@cartsys.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Mar 1999 21:37:06 -0800
From:	Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5 i586)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Porting csdpmi to djasm?
References:	<199903301057 DOT MAA02004 AT juno DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Martin Stromberg wrote:
> 
> Would that be feasable?
> 
> I see two benefits:
>   1. No more Borland needed.
>   2. Work out bugs in djasm and djlink.

Except all the C would have to be rewritten in asm.  *Not* good for
maintainability.

There are some free 16-bit C compilers around (DJ's GCC, and I think
something else written for the 8086 Linux port), but I don't know how
good they are, nor if they have libraries with even the basic stuff that
CWSDPMI uses.
-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com

- Raw text -