delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:07:32 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <199903161907.OAA20168@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <199903151815.NAA06375@mccoy2.ECE.McGill.CA> (message from Alain |
Magloire on Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:15:42 -0500 (EST)) | |
Subject: | Re: diffs for socket error codes and messages |
References: | <199903151815 DOT NAA06375 AT mccoy2 DOT ECE DOT McGill DOT CA> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> I tend to agree with you to keep most of libsocket separated > but it would probably make it easier for Richard D. to have some > hooks in the C lib. I agree this would be good, but the question is: do the values used by libsocket match the ones defined by POSIX? If not, we're wasting time, and should be fixing libsocket (et al) to match POSIX before we put the POSIX values in djgpp.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |