Date:	Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:13:39 -0500
Message-Id:	<199903101813.NAA08250@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning:	envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<658F56E5.19990310190340.FOO-61CD.frank@goedel.fjf.gnu.de>
	(message from Frank Heckenbach on Wed, 10 Mar 1999 19:03:40 +0100)
Subject:	Re: DJGPP preprocessor and link command specs
References:	<658F56E5 DOT 19990310190340 DOT FOO-61CD DOT frank AT goedel DOT fjf DOT gnu DOT de>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

gcc should dump the right specs, yes, so that external specs aren't
required at all.  However, if we choose to go this way, we should
remove the DJGPP_MINOR definition (I don't see a djgpp 3.0 in the near
or medium future, so that one can stay :)

> I don't know what is supposed to be the right solution, but to me it
> would seem most natural if the DJGPP compiler would dump exactly
> those specs that it needs.

- Raw text -