Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 1999 16:18:40 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Passing FLAGS from RMCBs
In-Reply-To:	<9902171404.AA12410@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990217161556.17443F-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Charles Sandmann wrote:

> No, the reason is probably that it was an oversight or easier to program
> this way.

Even better.

Is it still a good idea to mask off some dangerous flags before passing 
them back to real mode, or should we just let the lusers trash their 
machines? ;-)

> The wrappers also suffer from bad stack management among other things and
> have always needed some TLC

Can you say a couple of words about what's bad in stack management there?

And what's a TLC?

- Raw text -