Date:	Tue, 2 Feb 1999 09:26:39 +0100
From:	Laszlo Molnar <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
To:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: egcs patch
Message-ID:	<19990202092639.A21433@duna41>
References:	<B0000069167 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv>; <19990201142609 DOT A20469 AT duna41> <B0000069247 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.94.17i
In-Reply-To:	<B0000069247@stargate.astr.lu.lv>; from Andris Pavenis on Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 05:50:40PM +0200
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 05:50:40PM +0200, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> What we will do when gdb will support C++ exceptions. Are we going to put
> this information back then. Perhaps it's best not to touch eh_frame section
> too much not to break things we may need later.

AFAIK, gdb will not use information that is in section .eh_frame. It'll
use .debug_frame. And on djgpp there is no .eh_frame section in
linked executables, because it's merged into .data. So I think hacking
eh_frame won't cause problems.

Laszlo

- Raw text -