From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<199901311416.PAA09587@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: stat on FAT32 (was: Re: FAT32 (xstat.c))
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date:	Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:16:07 +0100 (MET)
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP-WORKERS)
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990131160924.19083C@is> from Eli Zaretskii at "Jan 31, 99 04:10:48 pm"
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL15 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > It seems to work fine. (In my test case it set st_ino to 24936.)
> 
> Yes, but is that the correct cluster number?  Can you use some low-level 
> disk utility (in plain DOS) to verify?

Nope. I haven't got any. (It sounds dangerous too.)

> I suspect that 24936 is only the low 16 bits of the cluster number 
> (unless in your case the high bits were accidentally zero).

I could use gdb to see what stat get for st_ino, if you want.


Scooter, No Time to Chill,

							MartinS

- Raw text -