Message-ID:	<369DD7F3.A336551F@oranda.demon.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 11:41:39 +0000
From:	"Gary V. Vaughan" <gvaughan AT oranda DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Organization:	Aethos Communication Systems ltd.
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, oliva AT dcc DOT unicamp DOT br, pavenis AT lanet DOT lv,
	snowball3 AT usa DOT net, autoconf AT gnu DOT org
Subject:	Re: patch for autoheader.sh
References:	<Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 9901130944510 DOT 52332-100000 AT ieva01 DOT lanet DOT lv> <oru2xvh8n8 DOT fsf AT araguaia DOT dcc DOT unicamp DOT br> <369C7317 DOT E2AE1CBC AT oranda DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <oraeznh30r DOT fsf AT araguaia DOT dcc DOT unicamp DOT br> <369C7BB6 DOT DBB43A78 AT oranda DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <199901131549 DOT KAA04784 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
 > IIRC, the cygwin maintainers are aware of the problem, but expect
> > win95 to go out of fashion before they fix it.
> 
> Not true.  *I* am the one working on the cygwin win95 bugs, and I
> have no intention of just "letting it go out of fashion".  Now, if
> you folks would let me know what the win95-specific problems *are*, I
> can get to work on them.

My apologies.  I have seen threads on the cygwin list which often end
with `but it works fine with NT', and jumped to the wrong conclusion.
In fact, after trawling the cygwin list archive, I can find no mention
of specific /dev/null problems on any win32 architecture.

So the original patch, with 's%exec > con%exec > /dev/null%', looks good
to me.

Gary.

- Raw text -