Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1999/01/06/11:21:25
> I believe the DJGPP practice is to have one underscore on functions
> that an application might want to call, and two underscores for
> functions that aren't supposed to be called directly by application
> code.
>
> DJ, is that right? I don't think it's written anywhere, but the
> pattern seems consistent.
Pretty much. Sometimes, the underscore use is determined by
compatibility with existing software or specifications.
> Hmm, the `__dpmi_...' functions seem to be one exception from this
> rule.
Can't have software without exceptions, can we? ;-)
- Raw text -