Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 1998 13:40:57 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Kbwms AT aol DOT com
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: RNG random()
In-Reply-To:	<6faf3a97.366d789b@aol.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.981209133916.8064L-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 8 Dec 1998 Kbwms AT aol DOT com wrote:

> > I want to reassure myself that I have the picture here.  On page 5,
> > you cite the Mitchell and Moore generator which Knuth (vol 2, 1981)
> > suggested "may well prove to be the very best ..." as having "highly
> > unfavorable properties and should be avoided."

Is it possible to summarize in a few words what those ``unfavorable 
properties'' are?

If not, just point me to the URL where this paper is available.  Thanks.

- Raw text -