delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 22 Nov 1998 14:26:49 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
cc: | DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: More rand() |
In-Reply-To: | <199811210114.CAA24788@father.ludd.luth.se> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.981122142557.17686S-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
On Sat, 21 Nov 1998, Martin Str|mberg wrote: > While we are discussing rand(), may I ask if there's any interest in > adding the slew of *rand48() functions? I think there is enough interest. Over the years, I have seen question about these functions posted to c.o.m.d. So I think addition of these should be welcome.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |