X-Authentication-Warning:	acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de: broeker owned process doing -bs
Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 1998 16:44:16 +0100 (MET)
From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
X-Sender:	broeker AT acp3bf
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: rand
In-Reply-To:	<199811171504.KAA29099@indy.delorie.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.93.981117164114.7061S-100000@acp3bf>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 17 Nov 1998, DJ Delorie wrote:

> 
> If ANSI doesn't specify the actual sequence of numbers, can we just
> keep returning zero from rand() until srand() is called?

No, at least not unless we're willing to return a constant zero from
rand() again, whenever the user called srand(1) himself. 

I strongly suggest to return to the current behaviour. It may confuse
newbies, but there's no way around that allowed by the standard.

Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -