From:	Kbwms AT aol DOT com
Message-ID:	<eea28e04.36250938@aol.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:27:36 EDT
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: libc math function upgrade work
X-Mailer:	AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Subj:	 Re: libc math function upgrade work
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)

Dear Eli Zaretskii,

On 10-14-98 at 08:38:04 EST you wrote:
>
> In my view, it is important to know how much speedup does one gain by
> using this version as opposed to both libm and the current libc
> versions.  (I would expect to see a significant difference, at least
> relative to libm.)  Otherwise, the merits of getting current versions
> replaced are not clear enough.  IIRC, one of Eric's original goals for
> doing all this work was to gain speed, so this aspect seems to be
> important to Eric as well.
>

I will write an independent set of tests on both libraries and will
send the results to you later this week or early next week.


K.B. Williams

- Raw text -