Sender:	vheyndri AT rug DOT ac DOT be
Message-ID:	<3580FC0A.4D10@rug.ac.be>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 1998 11:59:38 +0200
From:	Vik Heyndrickx <Vik DOT Heyndrickx AT rug DOT ac DOT be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
CC:	nate AT cartsys DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: inb/outb
References:	<199806112347 DOT TAA11699 AT delorie DOT com>

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > The `inb' and `outb' functions are missing their prototypes in <pc.h>.
> > Here is a patch.
> 
> Beware - some prototypes are left out of headers because various
> systems have conflicting definitions of them.  xmalloc, for example,
> is defined different ways in different GNU packages, and none expect
> the system headers to have them.

If I'm correct, the compiler assumes the default when a prototype is
omitted. Since the default is ``int'', isn't omitting a prototype
equally as bad as providing some prototype?

-- 
 \ Vik /-_-_-_-_-_-_/
  \___/ Heyndrickx /
   \ /-_-_-_-_-_-_/  Knight in the Order of the Unsigned Types

- Raw text -