Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1998/06/09/13:23:27
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> To find out what is wrong perhaps somebody could try replacing the
> "int $0x2f" in djlib/src/libc/dpmi/api/2f_1680.s with the assembler
> code of __dpmi_int (djlib/src/libc/dpmi/api/d0300_z.s) and then remove
> things until the problem appears?
I think the right thing is just to call Int 2Fh via __dpmi_int rather
than directly. Until now, everyone who had the problem with the original
version reported to me that the latter way works for them.
If no additional problems are reported in the next few days, I will
submit a change for 2f_1680.S (which will be now 2f_1680.c).
- Raw text -