Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1998/04/28/23:43:46
At 10:32 4/28/1998 +1200, Bill Currie wrote:
>Vik Heyndrickx wrote:
>> The workaround is that users simply can ignore this message.
>> The only solution I have found to avoid this problem is using Linux
>> instead :-(
>
>Why frown? :)
>
>> Any idea's someone?
>
>I wouldn't be surprised if Eli suggests this as well, but what about
>hacking make (dos build only of course), to allow the present to extend
>one (or is it two? DOS only encodes every second second (bletch, what a
>phrase:)) seconds into the future, thus skipping this. I don't think
>this will cause cyclic builds, but I guess it would need very thourough
>testing. However, I never hand such problems when make complained about
>the time stamps.
Or:
When `make' detects such an error, have it sleep for two seconds and try again?
It has the advantage of simplicity, though not of efficiency. :(
Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com
wer, but at least it assures compatibility. Any
>thoughts?
"Little" is quite an understatement here.
Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com
- Raw text -