delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Sender: | vheyndri AT rug DOT ac DOT be |
Message-Id: | <35446E35.5D55@rug.ac.be> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Apr 1998 13:38:29 +0200 |
From: | Vik Heyndrickx <Vik DOT Heyndrickx AT rug DOT ac DOT be> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv> |
Cc: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Patch to add target specific cleanup for gcc.c |
References: | <199804270915 DOT LAA57422 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv> <199804271144 DOT NAA33208 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv> |
Andris Pavenis wrote: > I think that creating one extra file can still be in average faster than opening EVERY > temporary files once more. Of course this is safer than approach I used, > but is it worth the overhead we'll have Have you ever measured the overhead emposed by a single file open? I've done a bit of testing and I can create and delete more than 1000 files per second on a moderately fast and optimized machine. IMO, It is really not a big issue. -- \ Vik /-_-_-_-_-_-_/ \___/ Heyndrickx / \ /-_-_-_-_-_-_/ Knight in the Order of the Unsigned Types
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright � 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |