Message-Id:	<m0yJiRd-000S3JC@inti.gov.ar>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From:	"Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 1998 14:37:40 +0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Auto-symified traceback
References:	<m0yJi7C-000S3DC AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.980330202056.20942H-100000@is>

Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:
> 
> > But then the overhead won't be so small, and the same applies: What if the 
> > program destroys some function needed for that making the the GPF even worst?
> 
> This consideration applies to the usual traceback as well: it uses DOS 
> I/O to print the stack frames.

Of course! and I got troubles with it more than once (nested GPFs). But 
reducing the size of code involved you reduce the probabilities that's all.
 
SET 
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013

- Raw text -