From:	Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id:	<199803160930.KAA21027@propus.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject:	Re: Where to get the latest sources for djtar
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 1998 10:30:21 +0100 (MET)
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.980315192316.11036A-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Mar 15, 98 07:27:05 pm
MIME-Version:	1.0

> Note that I have removed the DJGPP list from the addresses.  Patches 
> should be sent to DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> and to the djgpp-workers 
> list <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>.

Hmm. Is there a news group carrying the messages from 
djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com?

> Testing for ENOENT is likely to backfire, as DOS makes libc functions 
> generate ENOENT in too many cases.

Regarding my previous mail, about djtar shouldn't give up if it fails to 
create a directory if the nesting is too deep; well my patch does just
that. 

To correct this, I think we need to improve mkdir's setting of errno.

I have a patch for that (now). 

Just to see if a understand where I should post it: I should mail it to 
dj AT delorie DOT com. Should I mail it to djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com as well?
I should _not_ use the bug reporting at http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/bugs/?


Thanks,

							MartinS

- Raw text -