Message-ID:	<34F4947A.38E04490@gmx.net>
Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 1998 23:00:26 +0100
From:	Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
Organization:	none provided
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Laszlo Molnar <molnarl AT cdata DOT tvnet DOT hu>
CC:	DJGPP Workers List <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: GCC 2.8.0 for DJGPP
References:	<34E36D6C DOT 89DD0CAA AT gmx DOT net> <19980217133555 DOT 54442 AT beeblebrox> <34EECD00 DOT 51375E30 AT gmx DOT net> <19980224133528 DOT 44278 AT beeblebrox> <34F2FF85 DOT C685CD6F AT gmx DOT net> <19980225131325 DOT 23019 AT beeblebrox>

Laszlo Molnar wrote :
> 
> Ok, but this is a small performance hit. Two other directories are
> scanned by gcc, before it finds cpp and cc1. This is the only reason I

I would say: a very small perfomance hit!

> suggested directory search reordering. But if this is hard to do, I can
> live with that.

Changing this is not hard for me. That hard part here is to send the
patches the mainatainer and then that they accept, which I don't think
in that case.

> COMPILER_PATH is not set by me. So gcc only sees $DJDIR/bin. But why
> $DJDIR/bin/djgpp/2.80 is scanned first?

Because this is the hardcoded order in gcc.c

> > > ps2: the last 2 pathnames look strange for me...
> > Why this?
> 
> I mean these:
> 
> >c:/djgpp/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/2.80/$DJDIR/djgpp/bin/djgpp/2.80/cpp.exe,
> >c:/djgpp/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/2.80/$DJDIR/djgpp/bin/cpp.exe,
> 
>                                 ^^^^^^^^
This is one side effect of the new feature to have environemnt
variables hardcoded as default paths :-(

Robert
-- 
******************************************************
* email:   Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>     *
* Post:    Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW:     http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho        *
******************************************************

- Raw text -